More sharing options
WhatsAppLinkedInEmail

A bankruptcy petition is not an ordinary payment reminder. First examine whether the debtor has ceased paying, whether there are several creditors and whether a debt is due. As a creditor, you need a lawyer to petition. Filing for your own bankruptcy follows a different route and requires attention to legal form and authorised representation. If your business receives a petition against it, assess the hearing date and possible response immediately. This guide concerns Dutch bankruptcy law and helps keep the three positions separate.

Sources (4)
On this page

1. Establish who applies and against whom

Record the exact legal parties. A sole proprietorship and a bv do not have the same asset structure. A business with several holding companies is not one joint debtor merely because the owner is the same. Check who entered the contract, received the invoice and owes payment. A petition against the wrong entity does not resolve your unpaid order.

State whether you are a creditor, director of the business filing itself or recipient of a petition. Each role involves different procedural steps and strategic questions. A director must also check who may make the business’s own filing and which internal resolutions are required. A shareholder’s wish or personal exhaustion does not replace that preparation.

2. Assess cessation of payment and multiple creditors

Rechtspraak states that the debtor must have stopped paying and have two or more debts to different creditors, with at least one debt due. These are connected requirements. Two invoices of your own do not automatically mean two different creditors. The actual state must also be assessed; a substantively disputed invoice does not by itself establish that the business has stopped paying.

Collect reliable information about other debts and clarify your own knowledge. A supplier’s rumour differs from current confirmation. Ask the lawyer to assess what can serve as a supporting claim and the evidence required. Do not simply assume other creditors will cooperate or present their information as your own statement without permission.

3. Prepare a sound petition as creditor

Trace your claim through contract, performance, invoice, due date and payments. Include the debtor’s entire defence. Bankruptcy proceedings are not an automatic substitute for complex evidence proceedings over an order never established. Your lawyer must assess how the claim and bankruptcy conditions can be examined in the procedure provided.

Discuss why you consider this route and what happens if bankruptcy is actually declared. Filing alone gives you no priority over every other creditor. Payment under pressure also differs from opening bankruptcy. Have collection, security and insolvency consequences compared rather than relying only on the threat’s effect.

4. For your own filing, examine the decision and alternatives

Rechtspraak says a lawyer is not compulsory for your own filing, but expert advice can matter where debts and directors’ risks arise. Gather a current balance sheet, liquidity information, debt list, staffing details and security information. Identify payments no longer possible and realistic expectations. An incomplete form does not replace a business assessment of the position.

Have possible restructuring or another solution assessed in time. Debt assistance and Wsnp may separately matter for individuals; these are not the same arrangements as bankruptcy of a bv. Also distinguish dissolution of a business without assets from a business with assets and creditors. The right route depends on reality, not a wish to finish the paperwork quickly.

5. Respond immediately to a petition against your business

Keep the petition and hearing notice with receipt dates. Give your adviser both substantive defences to the claim and a current picture of payments and other creditors. Rechtspraak states that a defence may be oral or written and does not require a lawyer. This does not make the consequences minor; have the business’s procedural and financial position assessed immediately.

If negotiating payment, check whether the petition is actually withdrawn or the hearing adjourned. A promise that discussions are taking place does not itself cancel the hearing. Your own request to the other party to attend later is not a judicial decision. Have your lawyer confirm the status and keep the scheduled hearing in your diary until a different decision is clear.

6. Prepare for the hearing and possible ruling

Make your central issue and current amounts clear for the hearing. Payments received since filing, accepted corrections or supporting claims that no longer exist may matter. Supply that information immediately rather than using an outdated list. Ask who must attend and which documents the notice and procedural rules require. New facts can change the case without resolving every question.

After a bankruptcy declaration, the curator has a separate role in management and winding-up. A legal remedy does not wait for those discussions. Under Article 8 Faillissementswet, a debtor heard on the petition may appeal within eight days of the ruling. If not heard, the ordinary opposition period is fourteen days after the ruling; if outside the European part of the Kingdom when it is delivered, the Act provides one month. Following a ruling on opposition, the debtor has eight days to appeal. Article 9 likewise provides eight days to appeal refusal of an own filing or petition. Have a lawyer establish your procedural position, exact start and end dates and required filing immediately. These are not general periods for every creditor or other interested person.

7. Fictional example: disputed invoice and another supplier

Suppose a supplier wants to petition for a bv’s bankruptcy over an unpaid invoice. They hear that a second supplier also awaits payment. The bv disputes the first delivery and shows a recent partial payment to the second. Meanwhile, it cannot meet upcoming outgoings in full.

A useful file gathers the order, defence, current supporting claim and financial position. A lawyer can then assess whether the petition is suitable and substantiated or another procedure is needed first. This fictional example predicts neither refusal nor approval. It shows why an old list of rumours and one invoice do not answer the entire bankruptcy question.

8. Checklist for insolvency advice

Put any hearing date received first and state your role immediately. Request an initial check of parties, conditions and urgency. Then discuss financial and practical effects of a petition, defence or own filing, including costs and available alternatives.

  • Correct debtor, contract and complete substantiation of the claim.
  • Current information on other creditors and debts falling due.
  • Defence, payments and previous payment arrangements.
  • Petition, hearing notice and all receipt and hearing dates.
  • For your own filing: financial documents, authority and business obligations.

Frequently asked questions

Do two invoices of my own establish multiple creditors?

Not merely because there are two invoices. Official guidance requires different creditors. Also have cessation of payment assessed.

Must two creditors apply jointly?

Not necessarily. One creditor may petition, but the requirements, including multiple creditors, must still be examined.

Is a lawyer compulsory for my own filing?

According to Rechtspraak, no. A lawyer is compulsory when applying for another party’s bankruptcy. Complexity may make advice desirable for your own filing too.

Can I ignore a hearing notice while we negotiate?

No. Have the status of the petition and hearing confirmed. Negotiation alone does not cancel judicial consideration.

Sources

These sources relate to this page. For a specific case, check current rules and your own documents.

Related articles

Legal review

Not legally reviewed yet

This version has not been reviewed by a lawyer or legal professional. Checking sources or editing text is not legal approval.

Editorial team Business law in the Netherlands

We connect explanations to sources and record targeted changes. Legal review is attributed only to the actual reviewed version, with a real reviewer, date and scope. Human legal review of these articles remains open.

Ricardo van der Spoel

Ricardo van der Spoel

Editorial responsibility · Editorial organisation and technology