You cannot end a business contract without risk simply by writing that you have had enough. Dissolution for breach, known in Dutch law as ontbinding, requires examination of the obligation not being performed, whether the breach is sufficiently serious and whether default is required and has occurred. Settlement for what has already been supplied also deserves attention. Ask a lawyer to review the letter before you finally stop paying or engage a replacement. This guide concerns Dutch business contracts, rather than ordinary termination by notice of a relationship that is functioning properly.
Sources (4)
On this page
1. Identify the right legal question
Dissolution for breach responds to a failure to perform. Termination by notice ends a contract through an applicable notice mechanism; avoidance concerns other legal defects. KVK distinguishes these ways of ending a contract. Do not use the terms as interchangeable labels. An incorrectly chosen declaration can create a dispute over your intention and the obligations you still owed.
First describe in everyday terms what you want: delivery after all, partial termination, repayment or an exit from a long-term relationship. Note other interests, such as access to data, outstanding orders and dependence on a system. Your desired practical outcome helps your lawyer determine whether dissolution, performance, a settlement or another step is most suitable.
2. Examine which obligation has been breached
Compare the signed agreement, schedules, general terms and subsequent amendments with actual performance. What had to be delivered, by when, to what standard and subject to which dependencies? Disappointing sales results do not automatically amount to breach of a promised outcome. Distinguish specific agreements from expectations that were never agreed with the other party.
Link every alleged breach to evidence: an incomplete delivery, missing functionality or an undertaking not fulfilled. Include complaints and the responses. Have the seriousness and consequences assessed; not every minor defect justifies the same extent of termination. Dissolving a substantial contract in full may require a different assessment from ending a clearly defined remainder.
3. Check whether a final opportunity is needed
Where performance remains possible, default is often an essential issue to examine. A formal notice of default, or ingebrekestelling, generally gives the other party a clear, reasonable final period to perform correctly. Judgment ECLI:NL:HR:2003:AI0827 also discusses situations in which default can arise without such a notice. This requires an assessment of the actual circumstances; neither “always send a letter” nor “a letter is never needed” is a safe general rule.
Collect earlier demands, agreed dates and statements about failure to deliver. Establish whether a stated deadline actually had the required legal significance and whether later agreements changed that. An extension you accepted yourself may matter. In an urgent situation, ask how to preserve your rights while the contract is being examined, rather than trying to repair an expired deadline afterwards.
4. Assess any force majeure defence separately
A supplier may refer to illness, war, a cyber incident or failure of a subcontractor or supplier. KVK stresses that such circumstances do not automatically establish a successful force majeure defence. Read the contractual definition and consequences, and ask which obligation was actually affected. A general reference to difficult market conditions does not explain what became impossible in your specific order.
Keep the questions separate: can performance still be required, is compensation available and is termination permitted? These consequences need not be identical. Collect the notification, proposed alternatives and duration of the problem. A lawyer can assess the effect of the contract’s allocation of risk. Do not simply adopt a foreign model clause as an explanation of a Dutch contract.
5. Determine full or partial dissolution and the financial settlement
Specify exactly which contract or part of it is affected. For continuing services, identify the period and services already performed correctly. Prepare an overview of payments, deliveries and what you believe must be returned. The possibility of physically returning performance differs between goods and services already used; have the financial consequences assessed separately.
Do not assume that every historical invoice will automatically be repaid. A breach affecting a later part does not necessarily make earlier performance worthless. The other party may also have a position on the settlement. Ask your lawyer to align the requested dissolution and repayment so that the letter claims no more than the facts and chosen legal basis support.
6. Organise the declaration and any proceedings
A declaration of dissolution must make the relevant contract, reasons and intended scope clear. Keep a complete copy as sent and evidence of dispatch and receipt. Check which party and address the declaration must be directed to. A message to a random account manager is not a sufficiently documented formal step for every contract.
If the other party contests the claim, proceedings on the merits may be needed. Rechtspraak explains that the court in summary proceedings, or kort geding, cannot definitively dissolve or avoid a contract. An urgent interim order concerning access, delivery or protection can address a different question. Also check any choice-of-court or arbitration clause. Plan a transition to a replacement without ending all your existing obligations without review.
7. Fictional example: software lacks an agreed integration
Suppose a company pays for software with an expressly specified accounting integration. The supplier delivers a system without that integration and repeatedly promises a solution. The business owner wants the entire annual fee back and to block all payments immediately, although other functions have been used.
Useful preparation includes the specification, acceptance arrangements, promised repair dates and services used. The seriousness of the breach, any necessary final deadline and scope of the settlement can then be assessed. This fictional example does not establish a right to a particular refund. It shows why the missing element and objective of termination must be made specific.
8. Checklist before sending a dissolution letter
First request assessment of the legal basis and consequences, then drafting of the definitive declaration. Flag existing notice or response deadlines and the services that remain operationally necessary. Agree how the other party may respond and who will handle further communications.
- Complete agreement, schedules, terms and amendments.
- Specific breach alongside the performance originally agreed.
- Complaints, demands, promises of repair and all relevant dates.
- Payments, performance received and an itemised proposed settlement.
- Force majeure notification, jurisdiction clause and plan for temporary business continuity.
Frequently asked questions
Must I always first send a notice of default?
Not in every situation, but where performance remains possible the issue of default must be examined. Have any exception and the significance of earlier deadlines assessed.
Can a minor defect justify full dissolution?
That is not established automatically. The seriousness, nature and consequences of the breach must be assessed against the scope of the dissolution sought.
May I stop all payments immediately?
Dissolution and suspension of performance are separate questions. Have the basis and proportionate scope of a payment measure assessed before you commit a breach yourself.
Can the summary proceedings court end the contract definitively?
Rechtspraak states that dissolution or avoidance is not a definitive decision that can be granted in summary proceedings. Discuss a suitable interim measure and any proceedings on the merits.
Sources
These sources relate to this page. For a specific case, check current rules and your own documents.
- KVK — hoe je van een overeenkomst afkomt Accessed: 2026-10-23
- Hoge Raad — ECLI:NL:HR:2003:AI0827 Accessed: 2026-10-23
- KVK — overmacht bij te late levering Accessed: 2026-10-23
- Rechtspraak — rechtszaak beginnen Accessed: 2026-10-23
Legal review
Not legally reviewed yetThis version has not been reviewed by a lawyer or legal professional. Checking sources or editing text is not legal approval.
Editorial team Business law in the Netherlands
We connect explanations to sources and record targeted changes. Legal review is attributed only to the actual reviewed version, with a real reviewer, date and scope. Human legal review of these articles remains open.

Ricardo van der Spoel
Editorial responsibility · Editorial organisation and technology